In In re
Assyrian Babylon, LLC, 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5589 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2012), decided
by Judge Marlar on December 3, 2012,
the court held that a chapter 11 plan of reorganization was feasible despite
the fact that the debtor business had to essentially start over at a new
location.
The debtor
operated a sports bar in Yuma, Arizona.
A fire had occurred prior to the bankruptcy that left a portion of the
premises uninhabitable. During the bankruptcy
proceeding, a remodeling dispute arose between the debtor and its landlord and
major creditor which ultimately lead to the court ordering the debtor to vacate
the premises in June 2012. Just a few
weeks later, on August 2, 2012, the debtor filed a plan of reorganization to
which the creditor objected based on feasibility grounds.
The court noted
the six factors to be considered when evaluating the feasibility of a
plan: (1) the adequacy of the capital
structure; (2) the earning power of the business; (3) economic conditions; (4)
the ability of management; (5) the probability of the continuation of the same
management; and (6) any other related matters which determine the prospects of
a sufficiently successful operation to enable performance of the provisions of
the plan. The court also noted that
there was no operating history at the new location to which the debtor intended
to relocate and that the amount of new capital being infused into the venture
was “thin.” However, the court found
that the debtor had met its burden of proof on feasibility. The court stated that, “we are dealing with a
fairly small business that has successfully operated in the past” and, “[a]lthough
legitimate differences of opinion exist over the thin amount of new capital
being infused, and recognizing that, while more may be better, less is not
fatal to feasibility.”
No comments:
Post a Comment